Menu
About the DBA
  
  About the Bar
  Advertising
  Bar News
  Board of Directors
  Committees
  Dallas Bar Foundation
  DBA Presidents
  Event Videos
  Guidelines of Professional Courtesy
  In Memoriam
  Judicial Election Creeds
  Lawyer's Creed
  Mansion Expansion
  Oral History Project
  Photo Book
  Press
  Sections
  Staff of the DBA
  Texas High School Mock Trial Competition

Membership Info
  
  Member Benefits
  Application
  Committees
  Learn More About DVAP
  FAQs
  Lawyer Referral
  Sections

Calendar / CLE
  
  Calendar
  CLE Articles
  Event & MCLE Information
  North Clinic Location

Members Only
  
  2010 Dues Receipt
  Change of Address
  Committees
  DBA Member Directory
  Legal Forms
  Legal Resource & Expert Witness Guide
  Sections

Attorney Resources
  
  Bench Book
  Classifieds
  Courts - Jury Questionnaire
  Headnotes
  LRS Newsletters
  Law Libraries
  Lawyer Referral
  Links
  Mediators Standards of Practice
  Mentor Program
  MyTexasBar.com
  Pro Bono Opportunities
  Secretarial Placement
  Spanish for Lawyers
  State Bar of Texas
  Texas Lawyers' Assistance Program
  Transition to Law Practice Program

Public Resources
  
  Belo Mansion
  Consumer Tips
  Community Legal Resources
  Judicial Election Information
  Lawyer Referral Service
  LegalLine
  Legal Ethics Opinions
  Legal Resource & Expert Witness Guide
  Links
  Meeting/Catering at Belo
  Need an Attorney? Click Here...
  Secretarial Placement
  Task Force Report

Judiciary Info
  
  Bench Book
  Guardian Ad Litem
  General Election Polls
  General Info About Polls
  Judicial Election Creeds
  Judicial Links
  Judicial Poll Study Group Report Adopted by DBA Board Nov 2007
  Judicial Profiles
  Primary Election Polls
  Resolution on Judicial Campaigning

Fee Dispute Rules
  
  Fee Arbitration Response - PDF Doc
  Petition for Fee Arbitration - PDF Doc
  Rules for Fee Arbitration

Grievance Procedures
Sections
  
  Alternate Dispute Resolution
  Antitrust & Trade Regulation
  Appellate Law
  Bankruptcy & Commercial Law
  Business Litigation
  Collaborative Law
  Computer Law
  Construction Law
  Corporate Counsel
  Criminal Law
  Employee Benefits/Executive Compensation
  Energy Law
  Environmental Law
  Family Law
  Franchise Law & Distribution
  Government Law
  Health Law
  Intellectual Property Law
  International Law
  Labor & Employment Law
  Mergers and Acquisitions
  Probate, Trusts & Estates
  Real Property Law
  Securities
  Solo & Small Firm
  Sports & Entertainment Law
  Tax
  Tort & Insurance Practices
  Trial Skills




Presidents' Pages
2010
     Ike Vanden Eykel
2009
     Christina Melton Crain
2008
     Frank E. Stevenson II
2007
     Beverly B. Godbey
2006
     Mark K. Sales
2005
     Timothy W. Mountz
2004
     Rhonda Hunter




Dallas Bar Association
2101 Ross Avenue
Dallas, Texas 75201
View Map
214-220-7400
214-220-7465 (fax)


 
Judicial Profiles

Judge Catharina Haynes
191st District Court
by Sam Polak

Judge Catharina Haynes left the coastal town of Melbourne, Florida and came to Dallas in 1986, looking for a place where a person could succeed or fail on her own merits. She came armed with a Bachelor of Science in Psychology from the Florida Institute of Technology and a Juris Doctor with distinction from Emory University School of Law. She began her law career as an associate with Thompson & Knight, where she met her future husband Craig to whom she has now been married ten years. She continued her career with Baker & Botts for the next ten years as an associate and partner, where she became board certified in consumer law.

Along the way, Judge Haynes has been quite active in the legal community. She has served as Chair of the Subcommittee on Visiting Judges and as Co-Chair of the Judiciary Committee, for which she received the Dallas Bar Association Jo Anna Moreland Outstanding Committee Chair Award in 1996. She has also served on other Dallas Bar Association committees and as a volunteer mediator. In 1996, she was appointed by the Texas Supreme Court to its task force on juries.

These experiences prepared her for many of the issues which face judges today, but not for what life was like in the fall of 1997. During that time, she was working as a full-time partner at Baker & Botts, running as a candidate for election to the 191st Judicial District Court and building a home. Every moment of her life was scheduled. She truly enjoyed the election process, especially meeting people and touring our wonderfully diverse county. She also enjoyed, and has not forgotten, hearing the perspective of non-lawyers on the judicial system.

Since taking the bench in January 1999, a typical week for Judge Haynes consists of trials on Monday through Thursday. Her evenings during the week are typically spent preparing for the following day. She fits in non-jury cases when she can, and has even tried non-jury cases after hours. One recent non-jury trial began at 5:30 p.m., after a jury was sent home, and wrapped up around 8:45 p.m. Judge Haynes maintains a very active trial docket, having tried over twenty-four cases to jury verdict, since the beginning of the year. Fridays are reserved for Judge Haynes’ hearing docket, which often assists in bringing cases to resolution. She also finds time to enjoy her home and pool and spend time with her husband.

In managing her docket, Judge Haynes feels that the involvement of the Court in monitoring and assisting in the resolution of cases is important. Deadlines create settlement opportunities. She is prepared for hearings, having read the appropriate pleadings and motions before taking the bench, and expects attorneys to be prepared to be questioned and focus on the heart of the matter in dispute. Communication and conferences between opposing counsel are important parts of this process.

When asked, Judge Haynes had several suggestions for lawyers practicing in her Court. In drafting pleadings and motions, a very short introduction of what a case is about is helpful to the Court. Use of the available technology and physical evidence is very helpful to the Court and to juries (even simple things, often overlooked, such as diagraming an intersection in an automobile collision case).

Judge Haynes has enjoyed her first few months as a judge. She received a warm reception from her fellow judges and others in the judicial system. She has a very helpful staff and court coordinator. She truly enjoys the intellectual challenges of being a judge, and finds it very rewarding to make a difference in the lives of people who enter the courtroom of the 191st District Court, including attorneys, clients and jurors.

Fairness is Judge Haynes' top priority as a judge. She has been influenced by her experiences as a trial lawyer and the input she has received from residents of the county, other judges and attorneys. Without forgetting what it was like to be a trial lawyer, she also tries to balance the interests of other participants in the litigation process, such as jurors, and the integrity of the judicial system as a whole. Trial settings, pre-trial deadlines and expedient hearings and trials are important aspects of justice and fairness.

It looks like Judge Haynes has found a new home. Lawyers and non-lawyers should feel free to stop in and see what’s going on in the 191st District Court. You are likely to find a judge hard at work. And if you are set for trial in Judge Haynes' court, remember to be there early–she starts at 8 a.m.

Sam Polak is an associate with Payne & Blanchard, L.L.P. and a member of the DBA Publications Committee.
 

Copyright © 2000-2010 Dallas Bar Association