Menu
About the DBA
  
  About the Bar
  Advertising
  Bar News
  Board of Directors
  Committees
  Dallas Bar Foundation
  DBA Presidents
  Event Videos
  Guidelines of Professional Courtesy
  In Memoriam
  Judicial Election Creeds
  Lawyer's Creed
  Mansion Expansion
  Oral History Project
  Photo Book
  Press
  Sections
  Staff of the DBA
  Texas High School Mock Trial Competition

Membership Info
  
  Member Benefits
  Application
  Committees
  Learn More About DVAP
  FAQs
  Lawyer Referral
  Sections

Calendar / CLE
  
  Calendar
  CLE Articles
  Event & MCLE Information
  North Clinic Location

Members Only
  
  2010 Dues Receipt
  Change of Address
  Committees
  DBA Member Directory
  Legal Forms
  Legal Resource & Expert Witness Guide
  Sections

Attorney Resources
  
  Bench Book
  Classifieds
  Courts - Jury Questionnaire
  Headnotes
  LRS Newsletters
  Law Libraries
  Lawyer Referral
  Links
  Mediators Standards of Practice
  Mentor Program
  MyTexasBar.com
  Pro Bono Opportunities
  Secretarial Placement
  Spanish for Lawyers
  State Bar of Texas
  Texas Lawyers' Assistance Program
  Transition to Law Practice Program

Public Resources
  
  Belo Mansion
  Consumer Tips
  Community Legal Resources
  Judicial Election Information
  Lawyer Referral Service
  LegalLine
  Legal Ethics Opinions
  Legal Resource & Expert Witness Guide
  Links
  Meeting/Catering at Belo
  Need an Attorney? Click Here...
  Secretarial Placement
  Task Force Report

Judiciary Info
  
  Bench Book
  Guardian Ad Litem
  General Election Polls
  General Info About Polls
  Judicial Election Creeds
  Judicial Evaluation Polls
  Judicial Links
  Judicial Poll Study Group Report Adopted by DBA Board Nov 2007
  Judicial Profiles
  Primary Election Polls
  Resolution on Judicial Campaigning

Fee Dispute Rules
  
  Fee Arbitration Response - PDF Doc
  Petition for Fee Arbitration - PDF Doc
  Rules for Fee Arbitration

Grievance Procedures
Sections
  
  Alternate Dispute Resolution
  Antitrust & Trade Regulation
  Appellate Law
  Bankruptcy & Commercial Law
  Business Litigation
  Collaborative Law
  Computer Law
  Construction Law
  Corporate Counsel
  Criminal Law
  Employee Benefits/Executive Compensation
  Energy Law
  Environmental Law
  Family Law
  Franchise Law & Distribution
  Government Law
  Health Law
  Intellectual Property Law
  International Law
  Labor & Employment Law
  Mergers and Acquisitions
  Probate, Trusts & Estates
  Real Property Law
  Securities
  Solo & Small Firm
  Sports & Entertainment Law
  Tax
  Tort & Insurance Practices
  Trial Skills




Presidents' Pages
2010
     Ike Vanden Eykel
2009
     Christina Melton Crain
2008
     Frank E. Stevenson II
2007
     Beverly B. Godbey
2006
     Mark K. Sales
2005
     Timothy W. Mountz
2004
     Rhonda Hunter




Dallas Bar Association
2101 Ross Avenue
Dallas, Texas 75201
View Map
214-220-7400
214-220-7465 (fax)


 
Judicial Profiles

Mary Murphy
14th District Court
by Kevin McHargue

            After she finished presiding over her first jury trial, Judge Mary Murphy asked the members of her jury if they would mind posing for a group picture to commemorate the occasion. They were happy to oblige. When she came down to pose alongside them, the presiding juror took one look and gave his assessment: “You look taller on the bench.”

            She may look taller, but Judge Murphy admits she doesn’t feel any taller on the bench.

            “This job is very humbling,” she said. “It’s nothing like you would expect. Everything that I’m doing is something I’ve never done before.”

            In private practice, Judge Murphy specialized in high-technology intellectual property cases. Because intellectual property cases are typically filed in federal court rather than state court, she has had to deal primarily with new fields of law -- from medical malpractice and commercial disputes to workers’ compensation and asbestos cases. At times the cases tread more familiar terrain: she has heard a number of requests for injunctive relief arising out of trade secret disputes, which are filed in state court. But these cases present their own kind of problem.

            “Sometimes it’s dangerous when the law is familiar, because I think I know more than I do,” Judge Murphy explained. “With the new things, I have to begin at the beginning, with what the law is, not how I think the case should go.”

            She has also gained a new perspective on conflicts between lawyers. “As a lawyer, I used to want the judge to whack the other side over the head. As a judge, I have to step back and look at the situation more objectively.”

            Before running for the 14th District Court, Judge Murphy was a partner at Jenkens & Gilchrist and in her own specialty firm, Rochelle Hutcheson & Murphy. She served as a Civil Courts Master and entertained some thoughts of being appointed to the bench one day. But she never seriously thought about running for office until recently.

             “I never intended to run for the bench, not in my wildest dreams. After being asked different times by different people to consider running, something made me stop and think about it. Something in my heart said that this was the right time.”

            Judge Murphy decided to run against Judge John Marshall, who had presided over the 14th District Court for twenty years. She won the Republican primary in 2000 and took office in January of this year.

            After six months on the bench, Judge Murphy has found the most enjoyable part of being a judge has been “working with the juries.”

            “One of the best things about this job is watching the jury system work. They take their work very seriously. They almost become a family unit.”

            She recalled one trial in which the jurors reported that they had reached a verdict but asked for ten more minutes so that they could exchange phone numbers.

            “It’s a very serious job, but I insist that everyone maintain a sense of humor, so that we can all get through the day.”

            Not everyone agrees that Judge Murphy has retained her sense of humor. Her sons Ted, 14, and Mark, 10, complain that “I’ve gotten too boring as a mom. They’re mad that I won’t let them wrap houses any more.”         

            Balancing her new job and her family is a challenge but not an insurmountable one. To some extent, spending time with her family has been simplified by the fact that “so much of this job is reading. I can do a lot of the work at home.” She and her husband – Thompson & Knight partner Greg Huffman – included the boys in the decision-making process before she ever committed to running.

            “We made the choice as a family, and it turned out to be a very positive experience for them,” Judge Murphy said. “I was always prepared to lose, because you have to be prepared to lose. In fact I expected to lose. It just never entered the boys’ minds that I could lose. They were absolutely convinced that I would win.”

 

 

 

 

Kevin McHargue is an attorney in the appellate section of Baron & Budd, P.C. and a member of the DBA Publications Committee.

 

Copyright © 2000-2010 Dallas Bar Association
Page Execution: 0 queries in 0.03 seconds